These cartoons are a good idea, because Muslims have been hoodwinked so long, that finally having to face the truth is the first step in their freedom from these Gestapo-like mullahs and imams who have been brain-washing Muslims for far too long (1374 yrs)...

Maybe now Muslims will get the idea, that not only was Muhammad not a prophet, but he wasn't even a good human being. Muhammad raped, plundered and murdered, and he married a 6 yr old girl when he was in his 50's. He had everyone killed who disagreed with him. Muslims remain in denial about this guy....  He admitted twice in the Qur'an that he could do no miracles to show any divinity.  And Muhammad made no real prophecy.  In all the Qur'an Muhammad made only one (1) vague guess about the Romans winning some future battle; no time or place given.  That's it! One guess.  The real sad part is that Muslims are willing to, and gullible enough to bet their salvation on this guy. 
 

Here is an example of the typical intolerant, Muslim blood thirsty over reaction to these European Cartoons below:

Hamas leader Mahmoud Zahar told the Italian daily il Giornale on February 4, 2006 that the cartoons were an offense that should be punished by death.

"We should have killed all those who offend the Prophet and instead here we are, protesting peacefully," Zahar said.
 

Actually, the European Cartoons (some shown below), are not nearly as honest as this first (American) Cartoon below:
 

The cartoons have sparked diplomatic sanctions and death threats in some Arab nations, while media watchdogs have defended publication of the images in the name of press freedom.

Reporters Without Borders said the reaction in the Arab world "betrays a lack of understanding" of press freedom as "an essential accomplishment of democracy."

'Spiting Muslims'

France Soir and Germany's Die Welt were among the leading papers to reprint the cartoons, which first appeared in Denmark last September.

The caricatures include drawings of Muhammad wearing a headdress shaped like a bomb, while another shows him saying that paradise was running short of virgins for suicide bombers.

France Soir originally said it had published the images in full to show "religious dogma" had no place in a secular society.

Read entire story here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4670370.stm

The BBC being called "spineless:
Many people have rung or called the BBC complaining that the cartoons are not being shown on television news or the website.

EVIDENCE THAT ISLAMIC MULLAHS AND IMAMS FANNED THE FLAMES OVER THESE CARTOONS:

The above cartoons appeared in Egyptian Newspapers way back on October 17, 2005.  Below is from page 17 of Egypt's al-Fagr newspaper on that date.  Muslims used these to fan riots that began in February 2006.

The Truth about Muhammad (aka: Mohammed) is!

Writers issue cartoon row warning 1 March 2006 Salman Rushdie is among a dozen writers to have put their names to a statement in a French weekly paper warning against Islamic "totalitarianism". The writers say the violence sparked by the publication of cartoons satirising the Prophet Muhammad shows the need to fight for secular values and freedom. The statement is published in Charlie Hebdo, one of several European papers to reprint the caricatures. The images, first published in Denmark, have angered Muslims across the world. One showed the Prophet Muhammad, whose depiction is banned in Islam, as a terrorist bomber. Many newspapers defended their decision to reprint the cartoons on the grounds of freedom of expression. 'Global threat' Almost all of those who have signed the statement have experienced difficulties with Islamic militancy first-hand, says the BBC's Caroline Wyatt in Paris. They include Dutch MP and filmmaker Ayaan Hirsi Ali and exiled Bangladeshi writer Taslima Nasreen. "After having overcome fascism, Nazism, and Stalinism, the world now faces a new global threat: Islamism," the manifesto says. "We, writers, journalists, intellectuals, call for resistance to religious totalitarianism and for the promotion of freedom, equal opportunity and secular values for all." The clashes over the cartoons "revealed the necessity of the struggle for these universal values," the statement continues. "It is not a clash of civilizations nor an antagonism of West and East that we are witnessing, but a global struggle that confronts democrats and theocrats." The writers said they refused to accept that Muslim men and women "should be deprived of their rights to equality, liberty or secularity in the name of respect for culture or tradition". They also said they would not give up their critical spirit out of fear of being accused of Islamophobia. "Islamism is a reactionary ideology which kills equality, freedom and secularism wherever it is present," the writers added, saying it is nurtured by fears and frustrations.   Feb 2008 Contradiction in Arab cartoon views   Blatantly anti-Semitic literature is on sale in Cairo, just like many other Arab capitals. The BBC News website's Martin Patience reports on the apparent inconsistency in the Egyptian reaction to the Danish cartoons caricaturing the Prophet Muhammad. Two hundred metres from the Arab League's headquarters in the Egyptian capital, Cairo, there are two newspaper kiosks on the pavement. Cairo bookstalls and shops sell anti-Semitic texts They sell all sorts of Egyptian papers and magazines - including Hijab, a fashion monthly for religious Muslim women showing a cover-girl wearing the latest style of headscarf. Passing customers can also buy books - trashy romance novels, computer guidebooks, and children's story books. But on closer inspection, both kiosks openly stock the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a notorious anti-Semitic text that purports to be an account of Jewish plans to rule the world, but was actually written by Tsarist secret police in 1905. They also sell Hitler's autobiography, Mein Kampf. West accused With protests continuing throughout the world over cartoons satirising the Prophet Mohammed, Arab League Secretary General Amr Mousa weighed into the crisis recently, accusing the West of operating "double standards" when it came to freedom of expression. When Islam is insulted, certain powers... raise the issue of freedom of expression. Freedom of expression should be one yardstick, not two or three   Amr Mousa "What about freedom of expression when anti-Semitism is involved?" asked Mr Mousa. "Then it is not freedom of expression. Then it is a crime. "But when Islam is insulted, certain powers... raise the issue of freedom of expression. Freedom of expression should be one yardstick, not two or three," he said.   Read this entire article: BBC

READ, "Muhammad, Terrorist or Prophet?" here: http://www.bibleprobe.com/mohammed.htm

"Mohammed" found in Bible Codes

If it were, it would not deny what is in that "book", especially after confirming the authority of the Jewish Torah and Christian Gospels.  If it were true, it would know the name of the true God is not Allah, but Yahweh....  

God is very "touchy" about His holy name.  He is not happy about Muslims misdirecting their sweet prayers to a pagan deity (Allah) and rejecting His only begotten Son's suffering, death, resurrection, and atonement.  He also is not happy with Mohammed making up Words (Qur'an) that He (God) did not say; thus leading billions of people astray - and misdirecting their sweet prayers to a non-existing deity.

Below have been found in the Bible Codes:

Words crossing diagonal above: "Blaspheming"

Red crossing Diagonal below Blaspheming (left to right): "Demon"

Blue diagonal right corner: "Satan"

Green across: "The Unknown God" (as in Muslims pray to a God not there)

The "O" in "Mohammed" is the "O" in "God" in "The Unknown God". This is saying that Allah of Islam is not the God of the Bible, who is the true God, but rather Muslims are worshipping a nonexistent deity.

AND  below: "MOHAMMED" crosses "PROFANE MY HOLY NAME"

Recommended Reading (Book)

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam
(and the Crusades)

Click picture to see at Amazon
 

It is unfortunate that not many more scholars are willing to confront this topic with honestly and integrity. That's because there is academic bias on campus. Muslim students will protest violently and try to get teachers fired. Liberal professors commit the crime of denial by ignoring how much violence and destruction Islam has caused around the world. Islam has been successful in completely wiping out many middle eastern cultures and languages and replaced them with the pagan religion of Islam that requires its made up, nonsense-filled, holy book (Koran/Qur'an) only be read in a language most don't even understand --the language of Arabic.

Muslims destroyed Jewish synagogues, Christian churches & Hindu Temples all over the world, in their zeal to convert the entire world to Islam.

In retrospect, the Crusades were a good thing. They probably allowed the western world a thousand years of freedom from the diabolical Islamic religion. They stopped the expansion of the Islamic empire. This allowed Christianity to prosper in Europe which preserved the gospel for the rest of the world to receive. Christians should never apologize for the the Crusades, because these were a reaction to the Muslim crusades against the entire world. In the 7th century the Muslims took control of Jerusalem, and in the 11th century they began to hassle, kill, molest Christian pilgrims in the Jerusalem area. The Crusades were also in response to the cries of help from the eastern Byzantine Empire, which was very worried about the military threat to it from the Seljuk Turks. So if the Christians did not respond, the Muslims would have conquered all of Europe and wiped out Christianity from the planet. Today we would all be bowing to Mecca instead of worshipping Jesus.